That's why he recommended reinforcement in the areas that WEREN'T hit on the returning aircraft. They hit the aircraft that DIDN'T make it home! "Since the defense against incoming enemy planes basically blankets the sky with sheets of anti-aircraft artillery, I wonder where all the 'missing' bullets from our patterns went?" Wald on the other hand, posed this plain yet pivotal question to army decision makers: In other words, the army incorrectly based their assumptions on the surviving aircraft. His conclusion was surprising: don’t armour the wings and tail. We need to increase armour to these areas. The US military’s conclusion was quick and simple: the wings and tail are obviously vulnerable to receiving bullets. *A rare, signed, higher resolution and non-watermarked version of this image is available for download at: was born in 1902 in the then Austria-Hungarian empire.Īfter graduating in Mathematics he lectured in Economics in Vienna.ĭuring World War Two, Wald was a member of the Statistical Research Group (SRG) as the US tried to approach military problems with research methodology.įor example, they mapped out the patterns of bullet damage from the returning aircraft and showed the most common areas that were hit by the firepower of enemy anti-aircraft weaponry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |